![]() The idé is that by placing the data first the programming envioment might help you find the right function or series of function (with tab complete ?), SuffixTree res=("GTAGT$",).suffixArray2suffixTree It teaches that the structure of the program follow from the structure of the data,Īnd I was looking for a programming language which uses this fact and places the data first. One of the reasons I have had look at Julia and wolfram is that I took a course in systematic program design some time ago. ![]() I don't know much about it but there is some talk about reactive programming. I considred D, Julia and Wolfram for a raspberry pi project.īut D(dmd) and Julia is not in the apt-get archve for raspberry piĪnd wolfram is behind a paywall on other platforms. Mostly to play with free-form linguistics but I couldn't get it to work. Least I know where to begin in case I need a program that would write What do Julia users do, for example, toĪvoid boilerplate code defining lots of types? I understand how toĪvoid writing boilerplate definitions in WL: it may not be easy but at Type Expr head :: Symbol args :: Array typ endĤ) but it doesn't really matter. To provide a starting point, here is the definition Would require reimplementing Julia in WL, much in spirit of Greenspun's Things Julia has that WL does not have? (Which means adding them to WL It's also about the languages' most distinctive features: are there It is untyped and proud of it types can be implementedĮasily but they are of little practical need in the absence of compiler. Interfaces via MathLink (which could be WolframLink already) and also Name of Mma's core language), implements meta-programming capabilities Meta-programming, macros, interactions with other languages and the wayįor example, Wolfram language (which is now the ![]() It's about the languages' most high-level features, like It's not about anything related to OOP (feel free to write about, sure,īut I will probably be very passive in discussions concerning OOP) It's about languages, not implementations, so Mathematica's FrontEndĬapabilities are irrelevant (and it's also not about “which one is Was one of the programs that inspired Julia.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |